Comments on: The leader(s) in charge drive the culture http://www.danmulhern.com/wordpress/2007/12/the-leaders-in-charge-drive-the-culture/ A weekly stimulant for those who lead Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:17:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 by: GAPetrie http://www.danmulhern.com/wordpress/2007/12/the-leaders-in-charge-drive-the-culture/#comment-21500 Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:07:11 +0000 http://www.danmulhern.com/wordpress/2007/12/the-leaders-in-charge-drive-the-culture/#comment-21500 As always, I believe your heart is in the right place. But, it seems to me that an element has been missed in the study or in its presentation. Perhaps both. We are looking in this case for a power that brings healthy life to the children and to the family as a whole, but especially for the sake of the children as I've read it. From what I read, this power is suggested to come directly from the host, the meal. That from the host, this healthy power goes directly into the children, which is nutritionally essential, and also into the family as a covalent whole, which is socially understandable. But, I don't think power comes directly from the host. No, I think there is something being overlooked, namely a healthy spirit. No doubt, when there is a healthy spirit in the family, they will find that not only do they eat together, but that the family members lead healthier lives, and that children are happier to be healthy members of the family. So I would see it that the power comes from the spirit through the host to the family, and also from the spirit directly to the family. I could even understand if somebody were to say that this is not necessarily so, that the power comes from the host and the spirit seperately but equally well. What is being posited, though, is that the power comes from the host, and that even the strong family spirit is entirely centered around the host. As always, I believe your heart is in the right place. But, it seems to me that an element has been missed in the study or in its presentation. Perhaps both.

We are looking in this case for a power that brings healthy life to the children and to the family as a whole, but especially for the sake of the children as I’ve read it.

From what I read, this power is suggested to come directly from the host, the meal. That from the host, this healthy power goes directly into the children, which is nutritionally essential, and also into the family as a covalent whole, which is socially understandable.

But, I don’t think power comes directly from the host. No, I think there is something being overlooked, namely a healthy spirit.

No doubt, when there is a healthy spirit in the family, they will find that not only do they eat together, but that the family members lead healthier lives, and that children are happier to be healthy members of the family.

So I would see it that the power comes from the spirit through the host to the family, and also from the spirit directly to the family. I could even understand if somebody were to say that this is not necessarily so, that the power comes from the host and the spirit seperately but equally well. What is being posited, though, is that the power comes from the host, and that even the strong family spirit is entirely centered around the host.

]]>